Including contractor costs under Employee Remuneration and Related Costs?

February 26, 2026
Share this good article

This is one of the most common questions I get from volunteer treasurers.

“If someone is a contractor, can I put them under Employee Remuneration and Related Costs in the XRB report?”

Usually, the question isn’t really about accounting.

There’s often a concern that including contractor costs under “employee” might imply an employment relationship — and all the legal responsibilities that come with that.

Let’s separate the two things:

  • Employment law classification
  • Financial statement presentation under XRB

They are not the same.


What did XRB clarify?

In the 2023 updates to the Tier 3 and Tier 4 standards, the External Reporting Board explicitly stated that contractor costs can be included under:

Employee Remuneration and Related Costs

This category is intended to capture the costs of people who are working in the organisation, even if they are not legally employees.

So yes — contractors can sit here.

When it makes sense to categorise contractor costs under employee remuneration and related costs

If your contractor is doing general organisational work, for example:

  • Administration
  • Bookkeeping
  • General management
  • Coordination
  • Operations support

Then it is entirely appropriate to include their payments under:

Employee Remuneration and Related Costs

From a reporting perspective, they are functioning like part of your internal workforce.

Most small non-profits use contractors simply because:

  • Funding is volatile
  • Work is part-time or irregular
  • Employment obligations feel too heavy for the scale of the organisation

That doesn’t change the nature of the cost in your financial statements.

When you might not include them there

If the contractor is directly delivering a programme or service — for example:

  • A programme facilitator
  • A workshop presenter
  • A counsellor delivering sessions
  • A contractor hired specifically for a funded project

Then their costs may be more appropriately categorised under:

  • Costs related to sale of goods or services (commercial activities); or
  • Other costs related to delivery of entity objectives

In this case, the contractor cost is part of delivering your mission, not part of running the organisation itself.


What matters most: consistency

Like many things in small charity reporting, the exact label is often less important than being consistent year to year.

If you classify your contracted General Manager under Employee Remuneration this year, then move them to Service Delivery next year, you make it harder to compare your financial performance over time.

The purpose of the categories is to allow meaningful comparison — both internally and externally.

So choose a treatment that makes sense… and stick with it.

A final reassurance

Putting a contractor under “Employee Remuneration and Related Costs” in your XRB financial statements:

  • Does not create an employment relationship
  • Does not change their legal status
  • Does not override your contract

It is simply a reporting classification.

Accounting categories do not determine employment law.

If you’re ever unsure, ask yourself:

Is this cost part of generally running the organisation,
or part of delivering a specific service?

That question will usually guide you to the right answer.

Was this article helpful?
YesNo

Still have questions?

Ask Duncan anything — big or small. He’ll get back to you ASAP, and your questions will help improve the information here for everyone.

Ask Duncan now >
Illustration of Duncan
Get good news each month by signing up to our newsletter:
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram